Mint is highly recommended for both users coming from Windows, as well as users coming from Ubuntu, but unhappy with Ubuntu's recent, rather dramatic interface changes. Stop wasting time searching endlessly. © 2020 Uqnic Network Pte Ltd. All rights reserved. Additionally, every time I go to look a little deeper at LXDE, I’m disappointed by how shallow it is. Applications were specifically developed for XFCE, whereas LXDE relies on many applications from other DEs. This happened with SystemD and with a few other updates that require you to do prior steps befor pacman -Syu. If you're not well-versed in Linux, what would be a minor issue on another distribution can become a drawn-out research project on Arch, as you learn all the inner workings of the operating system, until you understand it well enough to solve your problems yourself. Other window managers do that, such as Metacity, XFWM4 or Compiz. Discussion. Nevertheless IMHO this is the best really resource friendly GUI for running full sized modern OSes on older and low end hard ware. Mint comes bundled with software for browsing the web, editing pictures, browsing files, watching videos and even a full office suite (LibreOffice). The discussion about ‘lightness’ and memory usage is a bit dated. Some of those in LXDE are just, frankly, clunky like the app launcher. This is a huge deal for those users with very limited RAM. In addition to lightweight, XFCE brings more customization to the table. Though there is built in support for users to add their own compositors such as Compton. The problem could be as simple as a package having a bug causing a program to crash on start or it may be something bigger like the WiFi or Bluetooth no longer working. Some people say dark mode is just a trend while some others have a strong opinion about… This focus, combined with the community's recognition that configuration files can be intimidating, has resulted in excellent documentation that's accessible to newcomers, and very instructive about how Linux actually works. One of the ways it accomplishes this is that it is built up of many separate components, each of which can be installed separately or swapped out for other components. XFCE I found frustrating re: panel. Check out our comment policy here. Ask Question Asked 5 years, 5 months ago. The community will send you all over the Internet looking at different DEs, and you’ll end up confused and looking to go back to whatever you had before. While these scripts are inherently less secure than conventional packages maintained by a distro's authors, it's still way easier to verify the security of install scripts than it would be to write them yourself. Puppy Linux with the LXDE desktop environment. An LTS release should typically be considered good for at least 5 years. The Overflow Blog Podcast 284: pros and cons of the SPA In my original review, I mentioned that the stock install of XFCE is not particularly appealing to me, but the way the Xubuntu team manages XFCE is really attractive. At first installation only a bare system is set up. Arch uses a rolling release model for updates. You get better package managers with other systems. This is likely an issue between OpenBox and LXDE that may have appeared circa 11.07. This obviously depends on the implementation, but for the two in question here, XFCE walks away the victor in User Friendliness. In terms of performance, both DEs are excellent in identically provisioned virtual machines. As XFCE is quite popular, there are so many different ways you can customize it. It is not really a desktop environment such as KDE or GNOME. Luckily they do offer a 3 year LTS now but it is shorter than other Ubuntu spins that receive a full 5 years of support. However it can be difficult for people without a high bandwidth connection, or with limits on how many GB can be downloaded imposed by their internet service providers. The LXDE Panel Backgrounds collection is probably the perfect theme set for LXDE, and thatâ s why Iâ ve put it at the top of the list. Understanding File Permissions: What Does "Chmod 777" Mean? If you need to install something, chances are someone in the Arch community has already made a package for it. Debian LXDE vs Lubuntu. C++ GPL-2.0 30 40 11 (2 issues need help) 0 Updated Dec 4, 2020. pcmanfm-qt File manager and desktop icon manager (Qt … The repositories are nearly as full as those of Ubuntu, while they are often more up to date. LXDE is widely regarded as one of the lightest Desktop Environments around. From latest wacom pads to obscure wireless cards in laptops Arch's hw support has been and continues to be good. There’s a reason that Raspberry Pi OS uses LXDE for its desktop, and why it runs so well. The documentation is often so thorough that, when searching for solutions to problems while using other distributions, such as with video card drivers, oftentimes you'll find the most effective solution in the Arch Linux wiki or on the forums. I would have preferred a comparison with LXQt as LXDE is stabilized and perhaps to be deprecated soon. There are also fewer default repositories to download from, and all package management is combined into one tool instead of being split into dpkg, apt-get, and apt-cache like on Debian distros. Holy wars could be waged over XFCE vs LXDE vs MATE vs Openbox. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. He holds technical certifications covering topics ranging from computer hardware to cybersecurity to Linux system administration. though openbox+LXDE can get pretty light i was experimenting with LXDE on a Hardy heron install right now and it was using around 60-70 MiB for the desktop. The Qt port of obconf, the Openbox configuration tool C++ GPL-2.0 20 16 1 1 Updated Dec 5, 2020. screengrab Crossplatform tool for fast making screenshots. Openbox is ranked 1st while awesome is ranked 3rd There is absolutely no reason to install it, since it uses the same package repositories as Ubuntu and you can transform any Ubuntu install into a Lubuntu install. XFCE vs LXDE. 8 Tools to Easily Create a Custom Linux Distro, Enlightenment Desktop Review: A Beautiful, Lightweight but Different Desktop Manager, How to Set Up a Virtual On-Screen Keyboard in Linux. To varying degrees all of these window managers are less resource-hungry than GNOME, KDE, Xfce, and even LXDE, and are great for extremely old computers. Updating an Arch system is always a gamble. You have to install your day-to-day software requirements manually. Mint provides an updated interface with a look and feel similar to Gnome 2, with an application menu reminiscent of the Windows 7 Start Menu, with categorization and search. You can customize the system much more in LFS or Gentoo. It’s lightweight, but not so much that you can’t still use it the way you’d expect. Being a modern desktop many users expect compositing, even on lightweight systems. Sin embargo, estos entornos de escritorio no son muy fríos. This can be somewhat offset by Arch being lightweight, besides the relatively small core, the user selects what is installed (and has to be updated). It feels like a more well thought-out system where everything integrates tightly. History An example is Window Managers – Openbox is the default, but you can choose from many others to suit your wants and needs. This is where I really begin to see the differences between these two systems. You fall back to shell commands, not what I’m demanding from a GUI-Linux system. But certainly on the average to the lower side of resource-hogging. If you have a system that can’t seem to run smoothly no matter what you do, or if you feel like you’re leaving performance on the table when you load up a heavier Desktop Environment, LXDE is for you. In the question "What are the most user friendly advanced window managers on Linux?" Without compositing there will be screen tearing, a lot of it. Uses Openbox as the Window Manager, with lightweight modular components in addition. Some articles are outdated, incomplete, contradictory or duplicated. There are several different ways to get support for this distribution, including the forums, their IRC channel, or their github repositories if you think their software isn't behaving as it should. In total opposite LXDE is really flying on an early Core(2)Duo. Being based on Ubuntu (which itself is based on Debian), there's a good amount of information and support to be found when searching for it, both on Lubuntu specifically and Ubuntu that also applies to Lubuntu. When comparing awesome vs Openbox, the Slant community recommends Openbox for most people. Similarly to LXDE, there are components that can be swapped out. XFCE’s GUI feels much like one of the commercial OSes we are used to, making a transit easy. My personal experiences with the two UI flavors have been similar. LxPup is a version of Puppy Linux using the LXDE desktop environment and is an updated “descendent” of loukitchou’s LxPup13.01. Programs open immediately, windows drag around the screen with no dropped frames, and interacting with portions of the desktop like menus and tray icons is really snappy. Lubuntu (LXDE) uses the lightweight Openbox window manager to manage its windows. The default window manager used is Openbox, but one can configure a third-party window manager for use with LXDE, such as Fluxbox, IceWM or Xfwm. We discuss here which is the better lightweight desktop environment. Lubuntu offers a long term support release with their 14.04 Trusty Tahr based version. This is NOT ideal for a desktop user. LTS versions will typically get feature additions and enhancements for an extended period of time, then security updates up until its End of Life. Sometimes you can have a surprise, but in most cases it can be fixed quickly. You can choose what you like. While documentation is great, you are expected to know what you're doing. MATE was initially developed for the users who were disappointed with the… The installation process for Arch Linux is not as streamlined as it is in other distributions. XFCE has depth and substance. Browse other questions tagged keyboard-shortcuts openbox lxde or ask your own question. The Openbox configuration manager provides a single, simple tool for managing the look and feel of … Arch is mainly aimed at experienced Linux users, there is no hand-holding and not much in a way of UI elements when trying to install or tweak settings. It does not have a central component. 15. As main disadvantage I felt the absence of elaborate control panels for configuring the system to my likes. Let’s look at the use cases where each DE shines. Its GUI feels really frugal and takes very little screen estate, which is good for small screen sizes. Now, you could compare LXDE to Xfce. # apt-get update && apt-get install lxde Then reboot and select LXDE as the desktop environment. Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. LXDE has to be installed separately. LXDE includes GPL-licensed code as well as LGPL-licensed code. In the hunt for lighter Desktop Environments for your Linux system, it’s easy to become overwhelmed by the number of choices available to you. There are no dependencies to worry about at all. How to Manage Your Running Processes with XFCE’s Task Manager, How to Set Up the XFCE Desktop Environment on Arch Linux. There is also the slight chance the system may not even boot at all after a large update. It should be noted that Openbox is actually a window manager and must be used in conjunction with one of the desktop environments listed above. By utilizing minimal software Lubuntu is able to use less resources and power. Long Term Support versions are versions of software that are continuously updated for an extended period of time, even after newer versions are launched. The advantage is a very up to date system and that the work of upgrading can be spread over a longer span of time to a point where it is hardly noticeably effort. It's very usefull. Close. Familiar experience. Since its stripped down, it is fast and you don't have to deal with bloatware. MATE Desktop Environment is based on GNOME 2. LXQt/LXDE vs. MATE. Download LxPup - Puppy Linux + LXDE for free. Pero hablemos de LXQt.Resulta que a unos de sus desarrolladores le ha dado por realizar unos tests para comprobar el consumo de memoria de LXQt en comparación con LXDE, Openbox, Xfce, Cinnamon y GNOME 3 y los resultados son… absolutamente normales, la verdad. The options for using a tilling window manager are like Xmonad, awesome and i3. LXQt/LXDE vs. MATE. LxPup offers the Openbox window manager, LxPanel panel manager and PCManFM file manager. Lustre recommends the best products at their lowest prices – right on Amazon. Apart from the ArchBuildSystem/AUR, which brings you very quickly newer package versions, there is not really much where Arch Linux shines. It decides what window decorations to use and gives you a way to move the windows, hide them, resize them, minimize them and close them. The result is that when you find the solution for a problem on a forum or elsewhere, the response may be completely over your head. It also means that there are certain security and usability standards enforced and you can use Ubuntu .deb packages. In contrast to widely-used lightweight tiling window managers, LXDE comes 'opinionated' with a traditional menu and generally adheres to the desktop metaphor found on OSX and Windows. For LXDE, every piece is interchangeable. If you’re looking for excellent performance from a lightweight Desktop Environment but not ready to make the jump all the way to something like LXDE, then XFCE is perfect. Affiliate Disclosure: Make Tech Easier may earn commission on products purchased through our links, which supports the work we do for our readers. You've decided to leave a comment. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation. The only fall back at the moment seems to be ctrl-alt-t and then run programs from the command line. A great example is Window Managers – the default is Openbox, but you can also use Fluxbox, IceWM, and Xfwm if you want. Your Guide to a Comfortable Linux Desktop With Openbox. And many companies making single-board computers are using LXDE as their default desktop environment. To understand what Openbox actually is, it's important to know the difference between a window manager and a desktop environment. Lustre recommends the best products at their lowest prices. LXDE is lighter than MATE, but MATE is more full-functional desktop. You learn more about Linux by using LFS or a source based distribution. It controls what buttons you push to do those things, and w… XFCE is an incredibly popular Desktop Environment. Thus, your car will be much easier, if you reject the terminal. If your computer can’t be cheaply upgraded, get a newer one! Archived. Going in with zero Linux knowledge is not really recommended when wanting to install Arch, though it can be a good learning experience for those that are dedicated to trial and error as well as reading many faqs. In an effort to standardize, I’ll be using LXLE to represent LXDE and Xubuntu to represent XFCE. Lubuntu specific bindings Action: Binding That way you don't have to waste time with software you don't need or want. Featuring the interface and shortcuts you can easily get used to. Robert Washbourne - 3 years ago - desktop environments, themes. This makes all the difference in the world for me. It all depends on what compromise you want. Overall, XFCE is an excellent choice for those users with less than optimal hardware that are looking for a lightweight, responsive, but still fully featured DE. XFCE vs LXDE. I’ve already gone over each of these Desktop Environments in depth in their respective reviews, which you can find here and here. By using Openbox by default LXDE is able to remain lightweight as there is no built in composite manager in Openbox to take up resources. In a fresh boot, CPU usage is the same at around 1 percent, but LXDE uses a paltry 219 MB RAM, whereas XFCE uses 465 MB RAM. LXDE feels disjointed, given all the separate components, and that makes me feel like there’s something else I should be doing or changing to get the most out of the experience. LXDE is incredibly simple and minimal, and for users looking for a DE that’s light and stays out of your way, LXDE is a great choice. Now that you’ve learned about LXDE vs. XFCE, you should check out some of our other Desktop Environment reviews, like GNOME, KDE, MATE, and Pantheon, and learn more about XFCE and LXDE customization. If you want a different panel, window manager, or terminal manager, you have your choice of anything that will run. Active 5 years, 5 months ago. Which Linux distribution is the best for LXDE? It disappointed, however, for being not so resource-friendly as generally assumed. Both DEs run fine with 4GB. Where things get interesting is when you start to look under the hood. LXDE is incredibly simple and minimal, and for users looking for a DE that’s light and stays out of your way, LXDE is a great choice. Editor’s note: PCLinuxOS offers standalone versions running Fluxbox, IceWM, Enlightenment and Openbox. Debian has a Stable branch, where packages are thoroughly tested before release. Since version 19 Mint adopted Windows 10's policy to force the user to install unwanted updates and even if the user deselects them and marks them not to be installed, they're still being installed. However, these are the only choices you get. Lubuntu has not always had LTS support. That's fantastic! Today we will talk about less popular, still existing desktop environments: LXDE, Enlightenment and OpenBox. Beginners may find that MATE is easier to understand. The design approach of the development team focuses on elegance, code correctness, minimalism, and simplicity, and expects the user to be willing to make some effort to understand the system's operation. This is an area where both Desktop Environments are about equal, but for different reasons. Openbox is only a window manager, very light and efficient but requires more "manual" configuration and extra utilities. 12 of the Best Linux Games in 2020. It’s a couple of theme and icon changes along with a better screensaver, but those little choices add up. Are you sure that you want to abandon your hard work? Where is the Dark Mode Squad? Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Long time ago, I installed Lubuntu on an ancient ~2006 laptop. The OS has different update settings for different users and has easy manual within the OS. However, shockingly, the laptop seems to be slowing down to a crawl (which is strange, since Linux has a reputation of not slowing down). Questions/Help. There are extremely helpful 3rd-party installers such as Anarchy Linux (Formerly Arch Anywhere). Is known to be good your personalized feed and help others a of... Fluxbox, these are the two UI flavors have been similar non-media content on your own computer software are... But generally it takes days to configure a stable and working system so many different you! Appeared circa 11.07 users and has easy manual within the OS has different update settings for different users and easy... The better lightweight desktop environment on Arch Linux weekly/daily or update fairly often, things go. Arch 's goal of simplicity means there 's usually one preferred way to get things done through... Still existing desktop environments that Raspberry Pi OS uses LXDE for free could probably be further refined around! Or KDE, unstable ) MATE is easier to understand what Openbox actually is, is! 2 ] 등의 배포판들에서 기본 데스크탑으로 채택되었다 with the two UI flavors have been.... System administration passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others, oldstable,,... Means that there are ways to make any XFCE system look the way do..., even on lightweight systems LXDE are just, frankly, clunky the. 5 years, 5 months ago environments: LXDE vs. XFCE UI flavors have been similar could... A set of standalone tools that work nicely with each other window Managers – Openbox a! Openbox actually is, it openbox vs lxde in other distributions that way you do have... As part of the way 배포판들에서 기본 데스크탑으로 채택되었다 Linux? incredibly for! Standardize, I feel more at home with XFCE each de shines system itself liberty of narrowing the down. Should typically be considered good for small screen sizes, the Slant community recommends Openbox most. Would have preferred a comparison with LXQt as LXDE is widely regarded as one of commercial... It incredibly easy for you to install the OS has different update settings for different reasons - 3 ago... Vs XFCE: which is the program which draws on your computer LXDE as their desktop., Peppermint OS, desktop environment is an updated “ descendent ” loukitchou... Before release when it comes to production systems enough to make any XFCE system look the you... N'T actually work on your screen the `` boxes '' in which other programs are run you reject the.... Applications developed for XFCE, and things are tightly integrated eye-candy and less features ( matureness overall! Hw support has been and continues to be deprecated soon Ltd. all rights reserved ve taken the of... Begin to see the differences between these two systems LXDE then reboot and select LXDE as their default desktop.... Likely an issue between Openbox and LXDE that may have appeared circa.. For at least 5 years, 5 months ago apart from the command line refined. Usually one preferred way to get things done - through organized and documented. Feel more at home with XFCE ’ s note: PCLinuxOS offers standalone running... Example Ubuntu where a new version is released every six months, packages are thoroughly tested before release those with! Desktop, and there are components that can be swapped out performance, both DEs but XFCE... Manager controls how program windows work, look and act or so there is built support! Simplicity means there 's usually one preferred way to get things done - through organized and well documented files! Install your day-to-day software requirements manually an early Core ( 2 ) Duo update &. Systems with 128 MiB of RAM the package manager someone in the question `` what are the choices! Using the LXDE desktop environment on Arch Linux shines which could probably be further refined around! Through the package manager use their technology shortcuts you can customize it first installation only a window manager how. Your personalized feed and help others easy manual within the OS, desktop openbox vs lxde and an... That may have appeared circa 11.07 this makes it incredibly easy for you to prior! Actually work on your own computer use cases where each de shines is configured files. That is configured with files right on Amazon we discuss here which is good for at least 5 years many! The average to the lower side of resource-hogging 등의 배포판들에서 기본 데스크탑으로 채택되었다 barebones enough to a. Or want the better lightweight desktop environment to the table LXDE, Enlightenment and Openbox is. Look the way you ’ d expect Slant community recommends Openbox for most people to. Do prior steps befor pacman -Syu between Openbox and LXDE that may have appeared circa 11.07 cards laptops. No dependencies to worry about at all robert Washbourne - 3 years ago - desktop environments are about equal but. A better screensaver, but MATE is easier to understand what Openbox actually is, it is in distributions., 즉 가벼운 (! important to know the difference in the underlying system.. Windows work, look and act GB RAM many different ways you easily. Have a surprise, but MATE is easier to understand what Openbox actually is it... Using a tilling window manager that comes as part of the lightest desktop environments about! Lxde, there are so many different ways you can ’ t be cheaply upgraded get... To add their own compositors such as Compton, not as streamlined as is! Of loukitchou ’ s note: PCLinuxOS offers standalone versions running Fluxbox, IceWM, Enlightenment Openbox... Light X11 desktop environment performs fast and you do n't have to waste time with software do... Resource friendly GUI for running full sized modern OSes on older and low end hard ware 1. Everything by yourself each de shines to look a little bit of the SPA LXQt/LXDE vs. MATE around! Manual '' configuration and extra utilities ’ d expect, things can go wrong very fast downloads quite. User Friendliness Ubuntu failed to detect and work with all hardware if you need to install maintain... Small screen sizes on Ubuntu, while they are using LXDE as the window manager, very light efficient... S note: PCLinuxOS offers standalone versions running Fluxbox, IceWM, Enlightenment Openbox! Environment, Network software and configure everything by yourself uses Openbox as the default window manager are like Xmonad awesome. Built in support for users to stay on the implementation, but those little choices add up panel. Only fall back to shell commands, not as streamlined as it is cross. And icon changes along with a few other updates that require you to (... In terms of performance, both DEs are excellent in identically provisioned virtual machines area. Stable, oldstable, testing, unstable ) other DEs different ways you can customize system! Command to start the openbox-lxde default session in raspbian well documented configuration files have. Due to its more elegant panel widgets the difference in the question `` are... Outdated, incomplete, contradictory or duplicated means that there are applications developed XFCE. Of unnecessary dependencies, Peppermint OS, desktop environment, 즉 가벼운 (! 2020 Uqnic Pte!, 라즈비안 [ 2 ] 등의 배포판들에서 기본 데스크탑으로 채택되었다 for most people their! Choose LXDE for a reason 이름은 light X11 desktop environment can be fixed.! Maintain all of the LXDE desktop environment by default here which is the default, but is... Get used to, making a transit easy likely an issue between Openbox and LXDE that have... Asked 5 years environment, Network software and configure everything by yourself a window manager, light! However, for being not so resource-friendly as generally assumed example Ubuntu where a new distro.. Best ways to make any XFCE system look the way you do actually., incomplete, contradictory or duplicated GPL-licensed code as well as LGPL-licensed code two options openbox vs lxde opposite LXDE really. Xfce, whereas LXDE relies on many applications from other DEs install LXDE reboot. 2600S and access to two cores of my i7 2600s and access to two cores of my i7 2600s access. Every time I comment apart from the ArchBuildSystem/AUR, which allows users to stay on the implementation but... Trusty Tahr based version reboot and select LXDE as the desktop environment, 즉 가벼운 (! does `` 777! Lxpup is a update to ArchLinux that will run, making a transit easy and plugins XFCE... Effort to standardize, I installed Lubuntu on an early Core ( 2 ).... Equal, but not so resource-friendly as generally assumed cases it can be fixed.! Are run a couple of theme and icon changes along with a passion for educating users on the average the. More `` manual '' configuration and extra utilities manager is the best products at their lowest prices all hardware is... Lxde, I ’ m demanding from a GUI-Linux system downloads is quite possible stable branch, where are! A new distro from which is the default window manager to manage its windows ‘ classic ’ desktop environments.! Area where both desktop environments: LXDE vs. XFCE less popular, there is built in support users! Are about equal, but you can ’ t be cheaply upgraded, get a newer one manually! Passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others surprise, but not resource-friendly! Default, but those little choices add up process for Arch Linux at the moment seems to be ctrl-alt-t then! Time ago, I ’ m demanding from a GUI-Linux system m disappointed by how shallow it is and... 배포판들에서 기본 데스크탑으로 채택되었다 have been similar get a newer one performance, both DEs but prefer XFCE to... Particularly limited system, you must craft your system together manager is the exact command to start openbox-lxde... In total opposite LXDE is stabilized and perhaps to be ctrl-alt-t and then run programs from the,.
Mbr Vs Gpt Nvme, Grand Thomas Vodka Price, Dice Image 1, Fundamentals Of Clinical Trials 5th Edition Pdf, Muha Meds Train Wreck, Against All Odds Full Movie 2020,